Hip- bars or dermals | General Discussion | Forum
September 9, 2012
The gf has a question about hip piercings. She's had them done before with bars but they rejected. https://www.dropbox.com/s/w1i10kojrhvtde5/IMG_9945.jpg
She wants to get them done again, but is debating on to get the bars again or dermals. She's curious which of the two would be better for care, pain and won't reject as quickly.
October 3, 2011
i had bars on mine and they rejected that doesn't mean that bars arent the way to go if she was having issues with the bars dermals might be a good alternative i know with my madison it rejected 3 times before i put a dermal in it and havent had an issue since but both dermals and surface bars both run the risk of rejection and should be taken care of very well to prevent any issues i think my hip rejected mostly cause my GF likes to put her legs over me when we sleep and it kept getting tugged on im gonna get it done again in the future but ill take precautions like bandages on it while i sleep to prevent the same issue
December 19, 2012
October 3, 2011
i have both dermals and surface bars i can go either way on them theres some spots on the body that each work well on and they both have a equal chance for rejection dermals you can get an odd number of them witch i like and sampa von cyborgs new design for the dermals looks like it might work a bit better
February 27, 2012
January 7, 2011
Hip piercings aren't for everyone in terms of anatomy and lifestyle, certainly longer term.
Either surface or microdermals have their merits, but it really depends on placement. There is a quite a bit of variance in tissue in that area. A good piercer is really best to talk to, as they can assess the area and placement.
As a general rule though, i think microdermals are more likely to settle quickly, and cause less issue when they do reject.
May 24, 2012
Maybe a different mod would be more suited for that area. Some kind of combo scarification and tattoo would be unique and offer many options. Otherwise, maybe just some play piercings for temporary adornment would soothe the urge.
January 11, 2011
In my opinion, surface bars are a more viable option for that area. However, as was stated previously, clothing choices, lifestyle, aftercare and of course they quality of the surface bars has quite a bit to do with the success or failure rate of piercing in that area. I've personally done many many surface piercings in that area and the majority of my clients are still rocking them years later. With a great piercer and good jewelry, the success rate is far higher than an ok piercer with so so jewelry. The same goes for surface anchors. The advantage of surface bars over anchors is that the length of the bar under the skin provides a far more stable base if the area does happen to get traumatized, where as a surface anchor will more often than not start to reject or become problematic when traumatized.
In regards to different ends, with good jewelry, the ends for both a surface anchor and surface bar can be interchangable, the majority of manufacturers of quality body jewelry use the same threading, so finding ends for the jewelry shouldn't be much of an issue.
October 3, 2011
December 20, 2012
My money is on bars. Not for any particular reason other then they are more widely used, and jewelry is more widely available. Also, I recommend using a different metal. High quality gold (if you can find it) is usually a good choice for people who reject often.
While I don't have any surface anchors, I've heard from others they hurt more. I don't know much about their care except that it is mostly similar to that for a normal piercing, except you wear a bandage over it for quite some time so it doesn't get pulled out. In the hip area, I get the feeling pants may tug on them quite often, like when you sit in a car for example.
Most Users Ever Online: 116
Currently Browsing this Page:
Guest Posters: 60
Newest Members: Liciaj78, jamesbritton, CarolineWebb, ampink7, chelsea98171, Ch3ls3a98171
Moderators: Oakbear (886), Richard Ivey (6)
Administrators: Chris Carter (191)